In politics, to belittle, no, try to undermine another candidate or candidate based on lies, machinations subjective and unique hypnosis therapy, you have to be either very clever or enjoy enough and proven credit. An issue that, so far, is conspicuous by its absence. PSOE, PP and PA, over the past years have been sucking the boat-all have taken (physical money) - and if the economic insecurity of the City is clear, much more so is its people with decent and noble approach feels cheated .
In Liberal Democratic Centre (CDL) first there is the person that every one of the measures taken have to pass the "filter" of the management committee, in its day and for each, identifying the people, that is, consultative and participatory.
Today, a brave, a clean-proven, "a fighter's town, a former mayor of Zurgena; we clarified the rumor, but rather the lie to both political leaders local and provincial governments have tried to instill in zurgeneros.
Juan Camacho Dominguez, "rewarded" by the Court of Auditors for its transparency rigorous accounting management and balancing during municipal governance, ie PROVEN CLEAN,
says: Facts and arguments Zurgena urbanism.
Alfoquia The core has adopted its definition of urban land (DSU) by the municipal council of Zurgena and in the same plenary session of Zurgena (Casco).
The solar Alfoquia pay Property Tax and Real Estate (IBI) - which, commonly called taxes, contributions, etc., since 1974, worth as evidence to build a sewage treatment plant in 1976. Therefore, both towns (Town and Station) contribute equally to the municipal coffers. No credit the unfounded rumor that the people, yes; The Alfoquia, no.
City Council of these three last legislature insists on NO recognize that the core of the Alfoquia has its definition of urban land (DSU) from the mid-70: Eye to the data but is included in the annual budget for this fund recurring income. As the City Council simply cheating the owners of such property.
Why not have building permits in Alfoquia mentioned solar and whether rustic field throughout the municipality? I have no doubt explode back . The legal and already approved, you can not vitiate, the illegal or non-approval, yes.
Following the adoption of the DSU MOPU approved 30 housing in the Barrio de la Cruz. Right?
Following the same DSU also MOPU approved 90 housing projects in the Alfoquia,
if "they are illegal? It's the same source and the same public body.
a public school was made Is it illegal? Should we tear it down?
The more than 300 houses built between 1975 and 1985 Are illegal demolition pending?
The households with more than 70 years are they illegal? And built by the Arabs Are they illegal? Do we demolish?
in 1987 and at the request of the State Administration, the City Council approved the price per m2 of land in La Alfoquia, by category and location of the streets , which led to its assessed value. If it was not urban land for what was done?.
The real fact to be considered for a General Urban Plan (Plan) as it affects the core of the Alfoquia is that there is DSU established, endowed by law for all services that are categorized as urban land: So, acoustic and administratively IS URBAN LAND. As a General Plan can not ignore this reality urban acquired rights to more than 40 years, "trying to get" in the lumped rustic and urban, IS A TYPICAL CRIME IN THE CRIMINAL CODE.
In politics, to belittle, no, try to Undermine Another candidate or candidate based on lies, machinations subjective and unique hypnosis therapy, you have to be either very clever or enjoy enough and proven credit. An issue that, so far, is conspicuous by its absence. PSOE, PP and PA, over the past years have been sucking the boat-all have taken (physical money) - and if the economic insecurity of the City is clear, much more so is its people with decent and noble approach feels cheated .
In Liberal Democratic Centre (CDL) is the first person there each and every one of the measures taken have to pass the "filter" of the management committee, in its day and for each, identifying the people ie, consultative and participatory. Today, a brave, a clean-proven, "a fighter's town, a former mayor of Zurgena, we clarified the rumor, but rather the lie to both local and provincial political leaders have tried to instill in zurgeneros.
IS IT OR IS NOT URBAN "LA Alfoquia? Juan Camacho Dominguez , "rewarded" by the Court of Auditors for its management transparency and balancing rigor accounting for its municipal governance, ie PROVEN CLEAN, Says:
Facts and arguments Zurgena urbanism.
The core of the Alfoquia has adopted its definition of urban land (DSU) by the municipal council of Zurgena and in the same plenary session of Zurgena (Casco).
The solar Alfoquia pay Property Tax and Real Estate (IBI) - which, commonly called taxes, contributions, etc., since 1974, worth as evidence to build a sewage treatment plant in 1976. Therefore, both towns (Town and Station) contribute equally to the municipal coffers. No credit the unfounded rumor that the people, yes; The Alfoquia, no.
The City Council last three legislatures are determined not to recognize that the core of the Alfoquia has its definition of urban land (DSU) from the mid-70: Eye to the data but is included in the annual budget of this fund recurring income . So the City Council simply rip the owners of such property.
Why not have building permits in those solar Alfoquia and if rustic land throughout the municipality? I have no doubt the hit. The legal and already approved, you can not vitiate, the illegal or non-approval, yes.
Following the adoption of the DSU MOPU approved 30 housing in the Barrio de la Cruz. Right?
Following the same DSU also MOPU approved 90 housing projects in the Alfoquia,
"If they are illegal? It's the same source and the same public body.
There was a Public School Is it illegal? Should we tear it down?
The more than 300 houses built between 1975 and 1985 Are illegal demolition pending?
The households with more than 70 years are they illegal? And built by the Arabs Are they illegal? Do we demolish?
In 1987 and at the request of the State Administration, the City Council approved the price per m2 of land in La Alfoquia, by category and location of streets, which led to its assessed value. If it was not urban land for what was done?.
The real fact to be considered for a General Urban Plan (Plan) as it affects the core of the Alfoquia DSU is that there is a consolidated, endowed by law for all services that are categorized as urban land: As , acoustic and administrative capacity is urban land. As a General Plan can not ignore this reality planning with rights acquired over 40 years, "trying to get" in the same bag rustic and urban, IS A TYPICAL CRIME IN THE CRIMINAL CODE.
As to the Alfoquia paid in 40 years, in addition to IBI, the various special taxes, supply network, street lighting, etc. politicians both local and provincial-entrenched by the Board-lying shamelessly, as well be committing a crime of malfeasance ..... see if bribery.
